Thought: If Sio basically lets us break rules, does that include the activity based one? So by extension would warnings not happen?
I meant that they’re kind of like a strike system and why would the system get points if there was no punishment … that being said I see your point
This game is kind of a headache right now, so I'm just gonna... go. When I come back, I plan on ignoring this whole thing. I'll just go do my ISOs normally and post when they're done. Maybe today, maybe tomorrow, maybe the day after. Okay, bye guys.
...Fine. I won't have much time for this game tomorrow either anyways orz... But before I vote... What were the "more AI things" you mentioned for Siostar? Can you quote them? Because I found some quotes too~ How certain are you that it's Siostar? If you're super sure it's her and that the game will end after she's lynched... then, claim your role please~
Spoiler @Siostar look at your previous readlists; there are no "almost scumread"s or anything of the sort. See? Nonhedge. Also we were all vague townleans before so uh... >.> Why is voting Xertz a plus if you don't think he's mafia after all? Why are your current SRs just OMGUS-es? Have you made any progress on your reads at all? Also why Adleto+Xertz from before?
I mean it looks indicative of that conclusion but I don’t see how that’s concrete enough to break PoE. It seems like you’re on the fence about Siostar (and I thought they were town too) but frankly, I’m out of options for who else would be scum
I don’t think I have to town case myself here—haven’t seen a non-PoE reason for a scum case—but I can try to form one if that’s what’d make you hammer
It's okay... I don't think I'd stick around long enough to read it, anyways. I'm gonna go to sleep after doing my dailies. And Cream's scumcase on Siostar was sufficient enough!